Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
View all indicators that include breakout data by topics such as race/ethnicity, age and gender.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
County: Shelby
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
32.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(34.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Shelby Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
46.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(43.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Shelby Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students
County: Shelby Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students
3.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
TN Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Teens who have Used Methamphetamines
County: Shelby Teens who have Used Methamphetamines
5.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
TN Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Teens who Use Alcohol
County: Shelby Teens who Use Alcohol
17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students
County: Shelby Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students
18.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
27.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(21.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
169.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(170.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(174.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
16.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
39.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(47.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
29.0
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(19.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Shelby All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Shelby All Cancer Incidence Rate
438.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(457.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(455.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
122.5
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(122.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(127.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Cancer: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
8.6
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(7.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
41.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
54.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(58.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
143.0
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(116.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(148.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Shelby Adults 20+ with Diabetes
12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Diabetes: Medicare Population
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Adults with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Shelby Adults with an Independent Living Difficulty
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Children with a Disability
County: Shelby Children with a Disability
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Shelby Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with a Disability
County: Shelby Persons with a Disability
12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Shelby Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Shelby Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Shelby Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Shelby Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Family Planning
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Teens who are Sexually Active
County: Shelby Teens who are Sexually Active
32.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(47.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Adults with Health Insurance
County: Shelby Adults with Health Insurance
85.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(86.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(83.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Children with Health Insurance
County: Shelby Children with Health Insurance
95.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(94.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(93.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with Health Insurance
County: Shelby Persons with Health Insurance
87.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Shelby Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Shelby Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
52.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Shelby Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
26.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,869.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(2,841.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,868.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Shelby Persons with an Internet Subscription
87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
103.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(120.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(102.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
210.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(212.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(92.9 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(207.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
24.5
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(31.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(30.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Heart Failure: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Hypertension: Medicare Population
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Stroke: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
19.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 60 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
53.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Shelby Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
58.1%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Babies with Very Low Birthweight
County: Shelby Babies with Very Low Birthweight
2.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Infant Mortality Rate
County: Shelby Infant Mortality Rate
8.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(5.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Shelby Preterm Births
County: Shelby Preterm Births
12.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 87 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Shelby
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
11.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 49 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(17.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Shelby Depression: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Depression: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby High School Students Who Attempted Suicide
County: Shelby High School Students Who Attempted Suicide
16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Life Expectancy
County: Shelby Life Expectancy
72.5
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(74.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Shelby
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Teen Fruit Consumption
County: Shelby Teen Fruit Consumption
25.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(20.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Teen Vegetable Consumption
County: Shelby Teen Vegetable Consumption
8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Disability
33.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Shelby Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
16.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
(2016-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 48 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Shelby Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(23.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(40.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
9.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
33.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
70.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 90 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(72.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(55.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Shelby
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
31.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(51.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(31.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Shelby Asthma: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby COPD: Medicare Population
County: Shelby COPD: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to HIV
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to HIV
4.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TN Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(1.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Chlamydia Incidence Rate
1,088.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(538.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1,071.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
496.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(227.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(561.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Shelby Syphilis Incidence Rate
38.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(16.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Teens who Smoke Cigarettes: High School Students
County: Shelby Teens who Smoke Cigarettes: High School Students
3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Shelby Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
34.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Shelby Teens who are Obese: High School Students
County: Shelby Teens who are Obese: High School Students
23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight
County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight
18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight or Obese
County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight or Obese
42.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
28.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Shelby
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Foreign Born Persons
County: Shelby Foreign Born Persons
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Veteran Population
County: Shelby Veteran Population
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population
County: Shelby Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population
17.6
Incidents per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(18.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Households without a Vehicle
County: Shelby Households without a Vehicle
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Shelby Mean Travel Time to Work
22.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Shelby Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Shelby Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Shelby Workers who Drive Alone to Work
80.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Overcrowded Households
County: Shelby Overcrowded Households
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: Shelby Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
54.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Shelby
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Median Household Income
County: Shelby Median Household Income
$59,621
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
($64,035)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Per Capita Income
County: Shelby Per Capita Income
$36,230
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
($36,040)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Children Living Below Poverty Level
27.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Families Living Below Poverty Level
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
16,599
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby People Living Below Poverty Level
18.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Shelby Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
30.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Youth not in School or Working
County: Shelby Youth not in School or Working
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Shelby People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Shelby People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
89.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Education / Student Performance K-12
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby High School Graduation
County: Shelby High School Graduation
80.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(89.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Prior Value
(77.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)
County: Shelby
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Access to Parks
County: Shelby Access to Parks
0.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
