Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Demographics Dashboard

The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.  

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Shelby

Population

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Population

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Total Population

Current Value:

County: Shelby Total Population

910,042
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (910,042) is less  than the previously measured value (916,357).
Prior Value
(916,357)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Age and Sex

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Age and Sex

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Shelby Population Under Age 5

6.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.8%), Shelby has a value of 6.7%.
TN Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Shelby has a value of 6.7%.
US Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (6.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Shelby Population Under Age 18

25.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (22.0%), Shelby has a value of 25.4%.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Shelby has a value of 25.4%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (25.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.4%).
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Shelby Population Over Age 65

15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (17.4%), Shelby has a value of 15.3%.
TN Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Shelby has a value of 15.3%.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (15.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Female Population

Current Value:

County: Shelby Female Population

52.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (51.0%), Shelby has a value of 52.6%.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.5%), Shelby has a value of 52.6%.
US Value
(50.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (52.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (52.5%).
Prior Value
(52.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Male Population

Current Value:

County: Shelby Male Population

47.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (49.0%), Shelby has a value of 47.4%.
TN Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.5%), Shelby has a value of 47.4%.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (47.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (47.5%).
Prior Value
(47.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Race and Hispanic Origin

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Race and Hispanic Origin

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Population White

Current Value:

County: Shelby Population White

40.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (78.4%), Shelby has a value of 40.6%.
TN Value
(78.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.3%), Shelby has a value of 40.6%.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (40.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (40.7%).
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Black or African American

Current Value:
54.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (16.5%), Shelby has a value of 54.1%.
TN Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Shelby has a value of 54.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (54.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.1%).
Prior Value
(54.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (0.6%), Shelby has a value of 0.4%.
TN Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Shelby has a value of 0.4%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (0.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Shelby Population Asian

3.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.1%), Shelby has a value of 3.0%.
TN Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Shelby has a value of 3.0%.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (3.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (0.1%), Shelby has a value of 0.1%.
TN Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Shelby has a value of 0.1%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
1.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.3%), Shelby has a value of 1.8%.
TN Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Shelby has a value of 1.8%.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (1.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.8%).
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
8.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.5%), Shelby has a value of 8.9%.
TN Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Shelby has a value of 8.9%.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (8.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
33.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (72.0%), Shelby has a value of 33.0%.
TN Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Shelby has a value of 33.0%.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (33.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Population Characteristics

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Population Characteristics

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Shelby Veteran Population

6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Shelby has a value of 6.6%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Shelby has a value of 6.6%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Shelby Foreign Born Persons

6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.4%), Shelby has a value of 6.8%.
TN Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Shelby has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Housing

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Housing

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Shelby Housing Units

405,182
Housing units
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (405,182) is greater  than the previously measured value (404,468).
Prior Value
(404,468)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Shelby Homeownership

49.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (59.6%), Shelby has a value of 49.2%.
TN Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Shelby has a value of 49.2%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:

County: Shelby Median Housing Unit Value

$206,100
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of $206,100 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $163,700 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $136,700.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($232,100), Shelby has a value of $206,100 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
($232,100)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Shelby has a value of $206,100 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$1,585
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of $1,585 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,173 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,325.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($1,449), Shelby has a value of $1,585 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
($1,449)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Shelby has a value of $1,585 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$568
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of $568 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $390 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $435.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($442), Shelby has a value of $568 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
($442)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Shelby has a value of $568 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,103
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of $1,103 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $777 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $863.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($1,047), Shelby has a value of $1,103 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
($1,047)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Shelby has a value of $1,103 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Family & Living Arrangements

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Family & Living Arrangements

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Households

Current Value:

County: Shelby Households

357,839
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Shelby Average Household Size

2.60
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.50), Shelby has a value of 2.60.
TN Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Shelby has a value of 2.60.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.6%), Shelby has a value of 9.8%.
TN Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Shelby has a value of 9.8%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
89.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 89.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 89.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (89.3%), Shelby has a value of 89.6% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Shelby has a value of 89.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 13.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (29.7%), Shelby has a value of 33.8% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Shelby has a value of 33.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Shelby Persons with a Disability

12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.3%), Shelby has a value of 12.7%.
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Shelby has a value of 12.7%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
88.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 88.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 88.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.9%), Shelby has a value of 88.6% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (88.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.1%).
Prior Value
(87.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby

Economy

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Economy

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
59.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 59.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 59.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (58.4%), Shelby has a value of 59.5% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Shelby has a value of 59.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
60.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 60.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 60.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (57.0%), Shelby has a value of 60.4% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Shelby has a value of 60.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Shelby Total Employment

433,510
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (433,510) is greater  than the previously measured value (429,454).
Prior Value
(429,454)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Shelby Total Employment Change

0.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (5.3%), Shelby has a value of 0.9% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Shelby has a value of 0.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (0.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-4.8%).
Prior Value
(-4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Shelby Mean Travel Time to Work

22.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 22.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 22.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (25.5), Shelby has a value of 22.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Shelby has a value of 22.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Income & Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Income & Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Shelby Median Household Income

$59,621
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of $59,621 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $54,357 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $47,994.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of $59,621 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value ($64,035), Shelby has a value of $59,621 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
($64,035)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Shelby has a value of $59,621 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Shelby Per Capita Income

$36,230
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of $36,230 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $28,321 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $26,545.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of $36,230 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value ($36,040), Shelby has a value of $36,230 which is higher and better.
TN Value
($36,040)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Shelby has a value of $36,230 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
18.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 18.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 18.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Shelby has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Shelby has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Shelby

Businesses

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Businesses

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Shelby Employer Establishments

19,659
Number of Establishments
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (19,659) is less  than the previously measured value (19,909).
Prior Value
(19,909)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.